C-235 (45-1) - Respecting Families of Murdered and Brutalized Persons Act
Chamber
commons
Stage
2nd Reading
Introduced
Sep 22, 2025
Progress
This bill increases the minimum parole ineligibility period for those convicted of abduction, sexual assault, and murder of the same victim.
Key Changes
- Creates a new mandatory minimum parole ineligibility of 25 years for anyone convicted of abduction, sexual assault, and murder of the same victim in the same event or series of events
- Allows judges to extend parole ineligibility up to 40 years based on the offender's character, the nature of the offences, and surrounding circumstances
- Requires judges to ask the jury for a non-binding recommendation on the length of parole ineligibility before dismissing them
- Adds a new paragraph (a.1) to section 745 of the Criminal Code to cover this specific combination of offences
- Adds two new sections (745.22 and 745.52) to the Criminal Code outlining the jury recommendation process and the judge's sentencing discretion
Gotchas
- The jury's recommendation on parole ineligibility length is advisory only — the judge is not required to follow it
- The bill applies only when all three offences (abduction, sexual assault, and murder) are committed against the same victim in the same event or series of events, which is a narrow set of circumstances
- The range of 25 to 40 years gives judges significant discretion, meaning outcomes could vary considerably between cases
- This bill may interact with existing provisions under section 745.51, which already allows judges to stack parole ineligibility periods for multiple murders
- As a private member's bill, it has a lower likelihood of passing into law compared to government-sponsored legislation
Who's Affected
- Individuals convicted of abduction, sexual assault, and murder of the same victim
- Victims' families, who may have longer assurance that offenders remain incarcerated
- Crown prosecutors and defence lawyers handling cases involving these combined offences
- Judges and juries presiding over such cases
- The federal parole and corrections system
Vibes
0 responses
Gotchas
- The jury's recommendation on parole ineligibility length is advisory only — the judge is not required to follow it
- The bill applies only when all three offences (abduction, sexual assault, and murder) are committed against the same victim in the same event or series of events, which is a narrow set of circumstances
- The range of 25 to 40 years gives judges significant discretion, meaning outcomes could vary considerably between cases
- This bill may interact with existing provisions under section 745.51, which already allows judges to stack parole ineligibility periods for multiple murders
- As a private member's bill, it has a lower likelihood of passing into law compared to government-sponsored legislation
Summary
Bill C-235 proposes changes to the Criminal Code to create a tougher sentencing rule for a specific combination of serious crimes. If a person is convicted of abducting, sexually assaulting, and murdering the same victim in the same event or series of events, they would automatically receive a life sentence with no chance of parole for at least 25 years — and potentially up to 40 years. The bill gives judges the power to extend the parole ineligibility period beyond 25 years, up to a maximum of 40 years, based on factors like the character of the offender, the nature of the crimes, and the circumstances. Before the jury is dismissed, the judge must ask them if they wish to recommend how many years the offender should serve before being eligible for parole, though the jury's recommendation is not binding. This bill was introduced as a private member's bill by Mr. Kibble in September 2025. It appears aimed at ensuring that offenders who commit the most extreme combinations of violent crimes against a single victim face longer periods of incarceration before being considered for release.
Automatically generated from bill text using Claude
Vibes
0 responses